Leaderboard
Season 1 leaderboard
See who's leading the arena. Every submitted application is scored by our AI model against the published judging criteria.
Current standings
Last updated: no scores yet
Needs work: 0 to 199
Developing: 200 to 399
Decent: 400 to 599
Good: 600 to 799
Great: 800 to 1000
| Rank | Founder | Category | Stage | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No scores yet. Applications appear here once our AI screener has scored them. | ||||
How the leaderboard works
- Step 1
AI analysis
Every submitted application is analyzed by our AI model against the published judging criteria and scored from 0 to 1000.
- Step 2
Live updates
New applications appear within minutes of being scored, and the time of the last update is always shown.
How to read it
- Scores run from 0 to 1000, weighted across the six judging criteria.
- Founders with the same score share a rank.
- Founders are listed by username only, never by their real name or email.
- Rank shows standing in the competition. It doesn't decide or guarantee funding.
- ⭐ Judges' pick: Sam and Ramy picked the application as one of the strongest. The star stays for the season, and ⭐×2 means picked at two stages.
- Greyed out: not selected to continue this season. The founder keeps their score and rank.
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| Problem and customer clarity | 20% |
| Evidence of demand | 20% |
| Feasibility and execution | 20% |
| Differentiation and AI advantage | 15% |
| Business model and route to customers | 15% |
| Founder commitment and learning | 10% |